I found the text below and thos I shud share
g=GMm/r^2
Well , all science students must be familiar with this ;
g is the gravity , G = Universal Gravitational Constant ,
M and m are masses of two bodies and r is the distance
between them . But I have observed that this equation also
measures the attractiveness quotient between two individuals.
I categorise relationships into three major types :
1) Formal
2) Informal n casual
3) Close n personal
Now letz see , in formal relationships , the physical and
emotional distance is such that there is very little “g” :
attraction . (Remember , g á 1/r^2 ) We meet people n we
forget them as time passes….
Next is casual , where “r” decreases n “g” increases , there is a
little pull , one wants to meet occasionally , chat n talk about
“ idhar-udhar ki baatein “.
The one where this attractiveness is highest is where there is least
distance , both individuals are under the effect of each other’s pull
n more closer u get , the more closer u wanna get…. N it becomes
impossible to forget , but u see where they is too much energy , the
personalities can collide and break each other into pieces , either it
breaks their ego or shatters them from inside n both are changed…
forever….!!!!
N here’s a quote to go with this :
“Short distance quickens love , long distance kills it”
Hey Vehle,
The equation g=GMm/r^2 is incorrect.
g=GM/r^2 (this is for a body outside of earth; meaning r>R)
g is not gravity; its accelaration due to garvity.
Now the force of attraction that you r talking is really
F = mg for a falling object, since a=g (a of F=ma fate) for an falling object
So ur argument should be based on
F = m(GM/r^2).
I guess this is a gr8 analogy of realtionships with distances.
I like the way you classify relationships.
I don’t agree with the quote though. I feel that “Love acquired quickly is lost double fast”.
U need some distance to foster, cultivate and rekindle ur emotions.
This is where the equation doesn’t hold true.